Corrigendum to “Cascaded incremental nonlinear dynamic inversion control for MAV disturbance rejection”[Journal of Control Engineering Practice 73 (2018) 79–90, (S0967066118300030), (10.1016/j.conengprac.2018.01.003)]

E. J.J. Smeur*, G. C.H.E. de Croon, Q. Chu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorScientificpeer-review

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The authors regret to inform that an incorrect transfer function was included in Eq. (12). The correct transfer function is: [Formula Presented] The selected gains were [Formula Presented]. This leads to a real pole at 0.964 and two complex poles at 0.965 ± 0.0445i. The difference of the model compared to the measured step response has now reduced, the largest difference being 4.8% of the final step value at 0.14 s. The mistake does not influence any of the conclusions drawn in the paper. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105093
Number of pages1
JournalControl Engineering Practice
Volume141
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Cascaded incremental nonlinear dynamic inversion control for MAV disturbance rejection”[Journal of Control Engineering Practice 73 (2018) 79–90, (S0967066118300030), (10.1016/j.conengprac.2018.01.003)]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this