Corrigendum to “Speed characteristics of speed pedelecs, pedelecs and conventional bicycles in naturalistic urban and rural traffic conditions” [Accid. Anal. Prev. 150 (2021) 105940](S0001457520317607)(10.1016/j.aap.2020.105940)

Divera Twisk; Agnieska Stelling; Paul Van Gent; Jolieke De Groot; Willem Vlakveld

doi:10.1016/j.aap.2022.106680

Corrigendum to “Speed characteristics of speed pedelecs, pedelecs and conventional bicycles in naturalistic urban and rural traffic conditions” [Accid. Anal. Prev. 150 (2021) 105940](S0001457520317607)(10.1016/j.aap.2020.105940)

Divera Twisk^*, Agnieska Stelling, Paul Van Gent, Jolieke De Groot, Willem Vlakveld

^*Corresponding author for this work

Transport and Planning

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Scientific

11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The authors regret that a mistake was made in Table 3 of the article. This table should read: [Table presented] The figures in bold, italic and red differ from the figures in the published article. As a result of these different values, the sixth sentence of the abstract should read: “S-pedelecs were much faster than conventional bicycles, amounting to a speed difference with conventional bicycles of 9.6 km/h in urban areas (M = 26.9 km/h vs. 17.3 km/h) and of 13.1 km/h in rural areas (M = 31.4 km/h vs. 18.3 km/h).” and the seventh sentence of the abstract should read: “The speed differences between pedelecs and conventional bicycles were much smaller: 2.8 km/h in urban areas (20.1 km/h vs 17.3 km/h) and 3.9 km/h in rural areas (22.2 km/h vs. 18.3 km/h). In the Discussion, Section 4.1. Comparison with previous studies on cycling speed characteristics, the second sentence of the second section should read: “Our study found similar patterns among Dutch riders. S-pedelecs were much faster than conventional bicycles, amounting to a speed difference in mean speeds in urban areas of 9.6 km/h (M = 26.9 km/h vs. 17.3 km/h) and in rural areas of 13.1 km/h (M = 31.4 km/h vs. 18.3 km/h). Values different from those in the published text are in bold, italic, and red. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Original language	English
Article number	106680
Number of pages	1
Journal	Accident Analysis and Prevention
Volume	171
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106680
Publication status	Published - 2022

Bibliographical note

Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care
Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.aap.2022.106680

1-s2.0-S0001457522001166-mainFinal published version, 268 KB

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Speed characteristics of speed pedelecs, pedelecs and conventional bicycles in naturalistic urban and rural traffic conditions” [Accid. Anal. Prev. 150 (2021) 105940](S0001457520317607)(10.1016/j.aap.2020.105940)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

1 Article

Speed characteristics of speed pedelecs, pedelecs and conventional bicycles in naturalistic urban and rural traffic conditions
Twisk, D., Stelling, A., Van Gent, P., De Groot, J. & Vlakveld, W., 2021, In: Accident Analysis and Prevention. 150, p. 1-9 9 p., 105940.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review
18 Citations (Scopus)

Cite this

Twisk, D., Stelling, A., Van Gent, P., De Groot, J., & Vlakveld, W. (2022). Corrigendum to “Speed characteristics of speed pedelecs, pedelecs and conventional bicycles in naturalistic urban and rural traffic conditions” [Accid. Anal. Prev. 150 (2021) 105940](S0001457520317607)(10.1016/j.aap.2020.105940). Accident Analysis and Prevention, 171, Article 106680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106680

@article{154246b901ac44bb9e5313afaf0b6881,

title = "Corrigendum to “Speed characteristics of speed pedelecs, pedelecs and conventional bicycles in naturalistic urban and rural traffic conditions” [Accid. Anal. Prev. 150 (2021) 105940](S0001457520317607)(10.1016/j.aap.2020.105940)",

abstract = "The authors regret that a mistake was made in Table 3 of the article. This table should read: [Table presented] The figures in bold, italic and red differ from the figures in the published article. As a result of these different values, the sixth sentence of the abstract should read: “S-pedelecs were much faster than conventional bicycles, amounting to a speed difference with conventional bicycles of 9.6 km/h in urban areas (M = 26.9 km/h vs. 17.3 km/h) and of 13.1 km/h in rural areas (M = 31.4 km/h vs. 18.3 km/h).” and the seventh sentence of the abstract should read: “The speed differences between pedelecs and conventional bicycles were much smaller: 2.8 km/h in urban areas (20.1 km/h vs 17.3 km/h) and 3.9 km/h in rural areas (22.2 km/h vs. 18.3 km/h). In the Discussion, Section 4.1. Comparison with previous studies on cycling speed characteristics, the second sentence of the second section should read: “Our study found similar patterns among Dutch riders. S-pedelecs were much faster than conventional bicycles, amounting to a speed difference in mean speeds in urban areas of 9.6 km/h (M = 26.9 km/h vs. 17.3 km/h) and in rural areas of 13.1 km/h (M = 31.4 km/h vs. 18.3 km/h). Values different from those in the published text are in bold, italic, and red. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.",

author = "Divera Twisk and Agnieska Stelling and {Van Gent}, Paul and {De Groot}, Jolieke and Willem Vlakveld",

note = "Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.1016/j.aap.2022.106680",

language = "English",

volume = "171",

journal = "Accident Analysis and Prevention",

issn = "0001-4575",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Twisk, D, Stelling, A, Van Gent, P, De Groot, J & Vlakveld, W 2022, 'Corrigendum to “Speed characteristics of speed pedelecs, pedelecs and conventional bicycles in naturalistic urban and rural traffic conditions” [Accid. Anal. Prev. 150 (2021) 105940](S0001457520317607)(10.1016/j.aap.2020.105940)', Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 171, 106680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106680

Corrigendum to “Speed characteristics of speed pedelecs, pedelecs and conventional bicycles in naturalistic urban and rural traffic conditions” [Accid. Anal. Prev. 150 (2021) 105940](S0001457520317607)(10.1016/j.aap.2020.105940). / Twisk, Divera; Stelling, Agnieska; Van Gent, Paul et al.
In: Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 171, 106680, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Scientific

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum to “Speed characteristics of speed pedelecs, pedelecs and conventional bicycles in naturalistic urban and rural traffic conditions” [Accid. Anal. Prev. 150 (2021) 105940](S0001457520317607)(10.1016/j.aap.2020.105940)

AU - Twisk, Divera

AU - Stelling, Agnieska

AU - Van Gent, Paul

AU - De Groot, Jolieke

AU - Vlakveld, Willem

N1 - Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - The authors regret that a mistake was made in Table 3 of the article. This table should read: [Table presented] The figures in bold, italic and red differ from the figures in the published article. As a result of these different values, the sixth sentence of the abstract should read: “S-pedelecs were much faster than conventional bicycles, amounting to a speed difference with conventional bicycles of 9.6 km/h in urban areas (M = 26.9 km/h vs. 17.3 km/h) and of 13.1 km/h in rural areas (M = 31.4 km/h vs. 18.3 km/h).” and the seventh sentence of the abstract should read: “The speed differences between pedelecs and conventional bicycles were much smaller: 2.8 km/h in urban areas (20.1 km/h vs 17.3 km/h) and 3.9 km/h in rural areas (22.2 km/h vs. 18.3 km/h). In the Discussion, Section 4.1. Comparison with previous studies on cycling speed characteristics, the second sentence of the second section should read: “Our study found similar patterns among Dutch riders. S-pedelecs were much faster than conventional bicycles, amounting to a speed difference in mean speeds in urban areas of 9.6 km/h (M = 26.9 km/h vs. 17.3 km/h) and in rural areas of 13.1 km/h (M = 31.4 km/h vs. 18.3 km/h). Values different from those in the published text are in bold, italic, and red. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

AB - The authors regret that a mistake was made in Table 3 of the article. This table should read: [Table presented] The figures in bold, italic and red differ from the figures in the published article. As a result of these different values, the sixth sentence of the abstract should read: “S-pedelecs were much faster than conventional bicycles, amounting to a speed difference with conventional bicycles of 9.6 km/h in urban areas (M = 26.9 km/h vs. 17.3 km/h) and of 13.1 km/h in rural areas (M = 31.4 km/h vs. 18.3 km/h).” and the seventh sentence of the abstract should read: “The speed differences between pedelecs and conventional bicycles were much smaller: 2.8 km/h in urban areas (20.1 km/h vs 17.3 km/h) and 3.9 km/h in rural areas (22.2 km/h vs. 18.3 km/h). In the Discussion, Section 4.1. Comparison with previous studies on cycling speed characteristics, the second sentence of the second section should read: “Our study found similar patterns among Dutch riders. S-pedelecs were much faster than conventional bicycles, amounting to a speed difference in mean speeds in urban areas of 9.6 km/h (M = 26.9 km/h vs. 17.3 km/h) and in rural areas of 13.1 km/h (M = 31.4 km/h vs. 18.3 km/h). Values different from those in the published text are in bold, italic, and red. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130023070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106680

DO - 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106680

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

AN - SCOPUS:85130023070

SN - 0001-4575

VL - 171

JO - Accident Analysis and Prevention

JF - Accident Analysis and Prevention

M1 - 106680

ER -

Twisk D, Stelling A, Van Gent P, De Groot J, Vlakveld W. Corrigendum to “Speed characteristics of speed pedelecs, pedelecs and conventional bicycles in naturalistic urban and rural traffic conditions” [Accid. Anal. Prev. 150 (2021) 105940](S0001457520317607)(10.1016/j.aap.2020.105940). Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2022;171:106680. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106680

Corrigendum to “Speed characteristics of speed pedelecs, pedelecs and conventional bicycles in naturalistic urban and rural traffic conditions” [Accid. Anal. Prev. 150 (2021) 105940](S0001457520317607)(10.1016/j.aap.2020.105940)

Abstract

Bibliographical note

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Research output

Speed characteristics of speed pedelecs, pedelecs and conventional bicycles in naturalistic urban and rural traffic conditions

Cite this