Validation of the SU2 Fluid Dynamic Solver for Isentropic Non-Ideal Compressible Flows

Blanca Fuentes-Monjas, Adam J. Head*, Carlo De Servi, Matteo Pini

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeChapterScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This work assessed the accuracy of the SU2 flow solver in predicting the isentropic expansion of Siloxane MM through the converging-diverging nozzle test section of the Organic Rankine Cycle Hybrid Integrated Device (ORCHID) [9]. The expansion is modeled using compressible Euler equations, and assuming adiabatic flow, while the fluid thermodynamic properties are estimated using the Peng-Robinson equation of state. The boundary conditions for the experiment and simulations correspond to a stagnation temperature and pressure of T¯0=253.7∘C and P¯0=18.36bar. At these inlet conditions the compressibility factor of the fluid is Z0= 0.58. The back pressure was equal to P¯b=2.21bar. The Mach number along the centreline, and static pressure along the nozzle surface were used as the system response quantities for the validation exercise. The studied SU2 model provides valid predictions for Mach number and static pressure. The largest deviation observed in the Mach number comparison between the simulation and experiment is in the uniform flow region of the nozzle and is equal to EMach= 0.045. Regarding the pressure trend, the largest discrepancy occurs in the kernel region and is equal to Epressure= 9 kPa. At the same time, the simulated Mach number and static pressure reach a maximum absolute uncertainty of ± 0.015 and of ± 20 kPa, respectively. For both quantities, these values are reached in the region close to the throat. All the uncertainties calculated for the simulated pressure profile were larger than those of the experiments. The static pressure is particularly sensitive to the geometrical uncertainties of the nozzle profile, especially inside the kernel region. A proper characterisation of the nozzle geometry was therefore required to perform a meaningful validation of the fluid dynamic solver. The developed infrastructure can be used in the future for the validation of SU2 in different operating conditions and flow cases.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationERCOFTAC Series
EditorsM. White
PublisherSpringer
Pages91-99
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-031-30936-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Publication series

NameERCOFTAC Series
Volume29
ISSN (Print)1382-4309
ISSN (Electronic)2215-1826

Bibliographical note

Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.

Keywords

  • CFD
  • error identification and uncertainty estimation
  • Validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of the SU2 Fluid Dynamic Solver for Isentropic Non-Ideal Compressible Flows'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this